By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The economic platform focuses on supporting producers and residents in rural areas, while strongly opposing tax hikes (such as the car tax, income tax, and VAT) and cuts to agricultural subsidies. They advocate for local food production and procurement in schools and kindergartens, standing firmly against centralized joint procurement schemes. Furthermore, they criticize the increase in bureaucracy, which prevents farmers from accessing investment grants.

Insufficient Data.

Insufficient information

His economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially concerning agricultural land, as this directly impacts the cost price of agricultural production. He criticizes the state policy that forces local governments to raise taxes and calls for national support for farmers to guarantee food security. He views lowering the land tax at the local government level as a positive solution.

The speaker is skeptical of the government's promise to cut bureaucracy, since the bill currently under discussion amends 98 laws. No direct positions on taxes, trade, or economic growth are presented.

Economic perspectives focus on fiscal responsibility and the inefficient management of resources within the defense sector. Emphasis is placed on the contradiction between acquiring expensive military technology and having an empty budget/stockpile ("the pantry is empty"), which points to concerns regarding the imbalance of state finances.

The speaker supports subsidizing small producers, viewing the grants as significant motivation and additional income, even when the subsidy amounts are marginal. He/She acknowledges that operating as a sole proprietor (FIE) or a private limited company (OÜ) generates tax revenue for the state, but criticizes cuts that harm small operators. Furthermore, he/she points out the immediate deduction of income tax from grants given to private individuals.

Economic perspectives are critical of the government's tax increases (car tax, VAT, excise duties, state fees), demanding clarification regarding their impact on the revenue base of local governments. They support increasing the financial autonomy of local governments and oppose budget cuts for state institutions (courts).