By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

Economic views are strongly pro-tax cuts, based on the belief that this keeps money circulating and increases budget revenue (a policy tested in 2020). It sharply opposes all tax hikes (including VAT, excise duties, car tax, and land tax), deeming them ineffective and harmful to the public's standard of living. The preference is to increase the disposable income of working people to stimulate consumption and economic growth.

The economic stance is strongly pro-business, calling for a reduction in taxes (labor taxes, VAT, excises, and income tax) to enhance the operational capacity of companies. The introduction of cheap labor is viewed as detrimental to the economy, failing to boost productivity, and distorting the local labor market.

He supports lowering energy prices by removing the CO2 component and criticizes the electricity exchange system, which, in his estimation, serves quota traders rather than producers. He emphasizes the protection of private property value and demands fair compensation from the state if nature conservation restrictions significantly reduce the value of the land.

Economic views are strictly tied to the fight against corruption and financial crimes. Personal financial responsibility (the filing of a personal financial claim) is demanded in connection with the 6 million euros allegedly stolen through the Slava Ukraini organization.

The economic arguments are implicit, focusing on the concern that the reduction of budgetary resources is the main driver for closing regional courthouses. The speaker suggests that the lack of money and staff in the budget is merely a pretext for consolidating services.

Insufficient data.

Economic views strongly favor tax reductions, seeing the lowering of excise duties and VAT as a means to reduce food prices and support entrepreneurship. The speaker is convinced that high taxation ("taxing your way to wealth") is ineffective and prevents the country from becoming richer. They support a fiscal policy that promotes favorable prices for consumers.

Economic perspectives stress the importance of fiscal transparency and accountability concerning major public investments. The speaker is demanding a clear clarification on whether the 2.6 billion euros should be classified as a revenue or expenditure line item, highlighting the necessity of strict financial discipline.

Economic perspectives are strongly opposed to tax hikes, specifically criticizing the increases in car tax, fuel excise duty, VAT, and land tax, all of which diminish the purchasing power of rural residents. The speaker stresses that high input costs and taxes will result in the closure of local services and shops, effectively making it possible to get by in rural areas only for the wealthy.