By Months: Hanah Lahe

Insufficient data

There is no direct confrontation or criticism directed at political opponents, as most of the speeches are neutral presentations of the committee's work. The only critical point is the question concerning the link between the car tax and the low birth rate, where the alleged causal connection presented by the second rapporteur is called into question.

The main opponents are EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party, who are sharply criticized for spreading anti-climate policy "lies" and "conspiracy theories." The criticism is ideological and intense, accusing the opponents of closing their eyes to global trends. He/She also criticizes the climate policy of the President of the United States as "unsustainable and highly reactionary," warning against adopting it as an example.

The criticism is aimed at the presenter's priorities and political focus, which prioritizes the risks of wind turbine infrasound over the proven, severe health impacts caused by oil shale energy. The critique is policy-based and intensely questioning, casting doubt on the presenter's choices.

The confrontation is aimed at Evelin Poolamets and her positions, particularly regarding her denial that climate change is man-made and her labeling of these events as hysteria. The criticism is also procedural, addressing the inappropriate introduction of topics (gender issues, hormones, e-elections) into the discussion of the draft Electricity Market Act.