By Months: Hanah Lahe

The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and respectful, employing honorific forms of address ("Esteemed Chair of the Session," "Honorable Martin Triipan"). The discourse is analytical and centers on logical appeal, seeking structured answers from the expert.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the detailed reporting of the commission's work and procedural progress. It employs logical appeals and fact-based language, emphasizing dates and consensus decisions. The tone is respectful, often addressing the audience as "Esteemed Chair" and "Dear Colleagues."

The speaker employs a style that is largely confrontational and passionate, particularly during climate debates, where they sharply criticize opponents' viewpoints, labeling them "lies" and "ideological madness." This is balanced by emotional appeals (concern for the planet and victims) alongside logical and data-driven arguments (HKS revenue of 200 million euros annually). The speaker also incorporates personal notes, criticizing colleagues for interruptions and rude conduct within the chamber.

The style is formal and analytical, employing polite forms of address ("Honorable Chair," "Esteemed Presenter"). The speaker poses pointed, data-driven questions to highlight political priorities and demands objective comparative data for the assessment of technical aspects. The tone is rather interrogative and challenging.

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, utilizing powerful rhetorical questions to challenge the opponent's viewpoints. The tone is critical and challenging, relying on logical arguments and the presentation of specific geographical examples to underscore the genuine threat posed by climate change.