By Months: Hanah Lahe

Total Months: 13

Fully Profiled: 13

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
06.2025

4 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation or criticism directed at political opponents, as most of the speeches are neutral presentations of the committee's work. The only critical point is the question concerning the link between the car tax and the low birth rate, where the alleged causal connection presented by the second rapporteur is called into question.
Details View Details
05.2025

25 Speeches

The main opponents are EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party, who are sharply criticized for spreading anti-climate policy "lies" and "conspiracy theories." The criticism is ideological and intense, accusing the opponents of closing their eyes to global trends. He/She also criticizes the climate policy of the President of the United States as "unsustainable and highly reactionary," warning against adopting it as an example.
Details View Details
04.2025

3 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the presenter's priorities and political focus, which prioritizes the risks of wind turbine infrasound over the proven, severe health impacts caused by oil shale energy. The critique is policy-based and intensely questioning, casting doubt on the presenter's choices.
Details View Details
03.2025

2 Speeches

The confrontation is aimed at Evelin Poolamets and her positions, particularly regarding her denial that climate change is man-made and her labeling of these events as hysteria. The criticism is also procedural, addressing the inappropriate introduction of topics (gender issues, hormones, e-elections) into the discussion of the draft Electricity Market Act.
Details View Details
12.2024

2 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
11.2024

5 Speeches

Strong opposition is directed at climate change deniers, or "non-believers," in parliament, who are accused of ignoring science and injecting misinformation into the electorate. The criticism is intense and personal, linking the opponents' activities to a direct security threat and the hindering of the country's development. Colleague Anti Poolamets is mentioned by name for mocking climate anxiety.
Details View Details
10.2024

2 Speeches

Significant opposition has been directed at the initiator of the draft legislation (Kalle Grünthal) and his proposal. He is being criticized for the lack of comprehensive answers and insufficient justification regarding the necessity of the bill. The opposition is based on policy and procedure, which resulted in the committee making a consensus recommendation to reject the draft legislation.
Details View Details
09.2024

6 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the political parties in the Riigikogu who deny the reality of climate change or do not consider it a threat, thereby obstructing substantive and dignified debate. This criticism is based on policy and values, emphasizing that such denial is irresponsible.
Details View Details
05.2024

6 Speeches

The opposition stance is primarily directed at EKRE, criticizing their scientifically unfounded and contradictory claims regarding the causes of climate change (cosmic radiation, volcanoes). In the debate over youth voting rights, conservative arguments concerning the immaturity, low activity, and liberal leaning of young people are systematically refuted. The criticism is policy- and fact-based, not personal, even though Urmas Reinsalu's specific views were directly inquired about.
Details View Details
04.2024

1 Speeches

There is not enough data.
Details View Details
03.2024

2 Speeches

There is no opposition. Criticism is aimed rather at general unsustainable consumption trends (overconsumption, land drainage) and the unequal distribution of water resources globally.
Details View Details
02.2024

3 Speeches

A strong backlash is aimed at political opponents who are spreading misinformation on social media about a colleague (Karmen Joller), claiming that she recommends eating insects. The criticism is personal and ethical, and it is being amplified by references to a previous court battle with EKRE and the threat of a new summons.
Details View Details
01.2024

13 Speeches

The main opponents are the sponsors of the draft legislation, who introduce unscientific or inadequately prepared amendments. The criticism targets both the substance (lack of sources, plagiarism) and the procedure (failure to coordinate the invitation of guests). The politician stresses that belief has no place in the legislative process.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling