By Agendas: Hanah Lahe

The speaker demonstrates expertise in electoral law and European Union election practices, referencing a specific draft bill to amend the European Parliament Election Act. They utilize comparative data, noting that 15 member states have a voting and candidacy age of at least 18.

The speaker demonstrates an interest in political connections and the logical consistency of arguments, focusing on the links between socioeconomic consequences (demographics/birth rate) and tax policy (car tax). There is no evidence of the use of deep technical or statistical expertise.

Expertise is evident in the legislative process and in specific areas of waste management, such as digitalization, waste transport, and metal waste. The second speaker demonstrated their authority by thoroughly referencing the commission's discussion and listing the sector-specific experts involved (the Deputy Secretary General and the Head of Department). Complex issues like greenwashing and the European Union Packaging Regulation were also covered.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures by presenting precise dates for sittings, readings, and deadlines for amendments. The analysis is aimed at clarifying the technical amendments and the procedural course of the draft bill, emphasizing the substance of the committee's 11 technical amendments.

Deep expertise regarding the regulation and objectives of sustainability reports (ESG), emphasizing the three main components of the reports: environment, social well-being, and economic sustainability. Demonstrating awareness of the shortcomings in explanatory memoranda and the working procedures of committees, including the importance of reviewing the minutes.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in environmental management and procedural regulations, specifically inquiring about the regulation of the procedural jurisdiction of specialized agencies and the record-keeping requirements for the on-site composting of biowaste volumes under one ton. They are also aware of the ministry's responses concerning the delegation of oversight to local governments.

The expertise centers on gender balance policies and their implementation in corporate governance structures (boards). Specific terms like "quotas" and "gender balance" are utilized. There are no references to the technical or financial details of the securities market law, as the focus remains on achieving social objectives through regulation.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of climate policy and the energy market, drawing on information and assessments provided by experts at the Ministry of Climate. Technical terms are employed (HKS, temporary exception, investment certainty), and a systematic explanation is presented regarding the utilization of HKS revenues (building renovation, infrastructure, sustainable mobility). Furthermore, international climate targets (China 2060) are referenced, and the unsustainability of US climate policy is analyzed.

The speaker demonstrates a detailed understanding of criminal justice policy, pointing to the lack of sufficient evidence and issues with court rulings where victims are often blamed. They specifically emphasize the necessity of consent legislation in the context of sexual offenses. This knowledge is derived from monitoring the media and staying informed about current affairs in Estonia.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the field of digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI), treating them as tools for achieving specific political objectives. Particular emphasis is placed on linking technology and environmental policy (specifically, solving climate issues). Furthermore, there is an awareness of previous digital social projects (such as language learning apps).

The speakers demonstrate knowledge of energy, environmental health, and noise/infrasound levels. Technical terms such as "infrasound" are employed, and reference is made to specific health indicators (life expectancy, infant birth weight) within the context of Ida-Virumaa. A second speaker seeks a technical comparison, requesting examples of infrasound levels in other sectors.

The expertise is demonstrated by citing the effects of climate change (wildfires, heatwaves, droughts) and geographical examples (Spain, Italy, Portugal). Furthermore, there is awareness regarding the substance of the draft Electricity Market Act, specifically criticizing the introduction of unrelated issues.

The speaker demonstrates authority in their knowledge of the details of legislative procedure and environmental law, utilizing terms such as "normative technical drafting," "producer responsibility," and "liability insurance for hazardous waste." This expertise relates to regulatory changes and issues of administrative burden, for instance, simplifying the reporting requirements for information campaigns. At the same time, a lack of knowledge is acknowledged regarding the technical execution of supervision, which was not directly discussed by the committee.

The speaker demonstrates a deep understanding of the intricacies of climate policy, referencing the exceeding of planetary boundaries and the implementation of climate legislation in EU member states (e.g., Finland). Technical terms such as "carbon budget," the "just transition principle," and "greenhouse gas sequestration" are employed. Emphasis is placed on adhering to the best available scientific data and expert recommendations during the legislative process.

The presenter demonstrates expertise regarding hunting regulations and legislative procedures, offering a detailed introduction to the discussion held by the Environment Committee. Specific statistical data from the Ministry of Climate is utilized concerning the number of hunters (12,000), the proportion of pensioners (27%), and the potential loss to the state budget (32,400 euros). Furthermore, a clear distinction is drawn between hunting and fishing, emphasizing the complexity involved in becoming a certified hunter.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the impact of climate change, not only on the state as a whole but also on the fundamental rights of the individual, relying on the authority of the Chancellor of Justice. The expertise is aimed more at setting a political priority and the need for a meaningful discussion than at presenting technical details.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the scale and consequences of the floods that occurred in neighboring European countries (Poland, the Czech Republic). This includes mentioning the number of casualties and the governments' deliberations concerning the declaration of a state of emergency. Furthermore, awareness was highlighted regarding the conditions for receiving European Union funding (emergency aid), which necessitates the official declaration of a natural disaster.

The expertise is evident in the field of waste legislation and food waste management, clearly distinguishing the priorities between food redistribution and its use as animal feed. The speaker employs technical terminology such as "problem products" and "biogas production," and relies on the commission's protocol and expert reports when providing answers.

The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topics of suffrage and democracy, drawing upon historical examples (the 1937 constitution) and international organizations (OECD, UN, the Council of Europe). He/She uses statistics regarding youth voter turnout (in local elections) and the low representation of young people in the European Parliament and the Riigikogu. The expertise is further supported by a reference to the Centre for Applied Anthropology's study on youth voting behavior.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of climate policy, energy, and the circular economy by employing specific terminology such as the "climate neutrality objective" and the "use of primary raw materials." This expertise is further confirmed by the presentation of concrete investment figures (e.g., 155 million euros for green energy production and 111 million euros for the transition to a circular economy). Separately, emphasis is placed on the Climate Act's role in establishing legal clarity and defining sectoral obligations.

The speaker demonstrates deep expertise in water management and climate change, drawing upon international (UN) and national (Ministry of Climate) data regarding water scarcity and consumption growth. Specific terminology is employed (e.g., "water resource reuse," "receiving body/outlet"), and references are made to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (6, 9, 12, 14). Concrete forecasts are presented concerning the projected increase in Estonian water consumption by 2040.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the structure of the education system (stages of schooling) and the need to integrate environmental education, using terms such as "integrated and broad-based environmental education." The expertise focuses on linking education policy and climate change. The knowledge is conceptual, not statistical.

The speaker demonstrates authority in legislative procedures and the work of the Environmental Committee, precisely citing the dates of the bill's readings and the specific nature of the proposed amendments. The technical term "of a legislative drafting nature" (or "normative technical nature") is used to characterize the amendments, which indicates a detailed knowledge of both the substance and the form of the draft law.

The speaker demonstrates expertise at the intersection of climate policy and diplomacy, underscoring that climate goals cannot be achieved solely at the level of one country or the European Union. They reference the Paris Agreement as a crucial global framework, thereby demonstrating knowledge of international obligations.

The expert assessment addresses the subject of political tactics and the disinformation spread by opponents, specifically referencing the social media narrative associated with Karmen Joller. Furthermore, there is knowledge regarding previous legal disputes between political parties, including mention of the lost court battle involving EKRE.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the Subsoil Act and legislative procedures, utilizing technical terms like "intent to draft" and referencing the subject of geological and general geological surveys. This expertise is based on the analysis by the Ministry of Climate and the commission, emphasizing the complexity of the permitting process.

The speaker emphasizes their knowledge of environmental and climate issues, referencing the completion of a Master's degree in Environmental Management. This expertise is demonstrated by demanding scientific sources and the ability to identify the non-scientific origins of text copied into the draft bill's explanatory memorandum (such as the "Eesti Eest!" portal). They also referenced the participation of experts from the Ministry of Climate and the Transport Administration in the committee debate.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the legislative process and matters concerning the aquatic environment by referencing specific issues discussed by the committee. These topics included the demand for water reuse, water usage permits, and the restriction and differentiation of drinking water use. This expertise is based on summarizing the input provided to the committee by officials and the minister of the Ministry of Climate.