By Months: Kalle Laanet

The speaker objects to the opposition's desire to establish an investigative commission, deeming it duplicative and suspecting that the true goal might be greater visibility. He criticizes the opposition for not utilizing more effective legal mechanisms, emphasizing that if there are indications of criminal offenses, they should approach law enforcement agencies directly. The criticism is primarily procedural and aimed at efficiency.

There is no direct criticism aimed at political opponents. The criticism is directed at systemic and procedural shortcomings, such as slow procedural rules, the occasional inability of judges to manage proceedings, and the lack of clarity in legislation, which allows for "legal acrobatics."

The criticism is aimed at financial institutions (banks) that refuse to provide reasons for their decisions, which the speaker believes is upsetting to people and is simply unacceptable. Specific political adversaries are not being criticized; rather, the focus is on institutional lack of transparency.