By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Laanet

The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the draft bill, criticizing the explanatory memorandum for its inadequacy in analyzing the impacts, particularly regarding economic costs and lost revenue. The criticism is procedural and political-analytical, not personal, and reflects the position of the government and the majority of the commission.

The speaker is criticizing the opposition (the proponents of the draft bill) for their desire to establish an investigative commission, viewing it as a duplication of existing work. They suggest the real aim might be simply to gain "more screen time" or to acquire information that legal channels do not actually allow. The criticism targets procedural inefficiency and the lack of added value, with the speaker recommending that if the opposition has genuine concerns, they should go directly to law enforcement.