By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Laanet

The speaker’s role is procedural, presenting the views and the course of proceedings of the Constitutional Committee. The political stance supports the rejection of the draft bill due to the lack of sufficient impact analysis, and preference is given to a comprehensive review of the system of public holidays and anniversaries. The necessity of complying with the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act regarding the timeframe for sending draft bills to the plenary session was emphasized.

The main position is against the formation of the Rail Baltic investigative committee, justifying this by the need to avoid duplicating the work of existing oversight bodies (the National Audit Office, the Select Committee on State Budget Control). The position is strongly procedural and results-oriented, emphasizing that an investigative committee is not a "silver bullet" for solving problems. However, the speaker acknowledges the immense importance of the Rail Baltic project and the need for clarity regarding its financing and expediency. The political framework is geared towards state efficiency and accountability.