By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The rhetorical style is serious, factual, and critical, especially concerning government inaction and budget cuts. The speaker balances legal analysis (improvements to the draft bill) with emotional concerns regarding vulnerable groups and the burden placed on parents. Direct accusations and acknowledgments (e.g., to journalists) are used to emphasize the need for advocacy, and the tone is concerned rather than conciliatory.

The style is formal and direct, posing a specific political question to the Minister of Finance. A critical tone is employed, casting doubt on the government's claims regarding the public's financial well-being, but the text concludes with a concrete political proposal/query concerning state bonds.

The rhetorical style is formal and direct, employing pointed questions that demand the minister take responsibility and provide explanations (e.g., "who did what wrong?"). The overall tone is critical and urgent, calling into question the credibility of the government's long-term planning. The appeals are primarily logical, focusing on the efficient use of resources and sustainability.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Minister directly and thanking the presiding officer. Logical argumentation is employed, introducing an international comparison (the Finnish President and Minister) to emphasize the importance of promoting vocational education and the deficiencies present in Estonia.

The style is formal and detailed in describing the legislative process, emphasizing the thoroughness of committee meetings and the precision of the minutes. The tone shifts to concerned and critical when addressing service deficiencies, government cuts, and the uncertainty of the social security system. Both logical argumentation (explaining procedural steps) and emotional emphasis (the burden of worry carried by parents) are employed.

The rhetorical style is formal and corrective, focusing on logical explanation and the precise definition of technical terms. The objective is to ensure clarity for both colleagues and the general public monitoring the broadcast. The tone is neutral, yet resolutely corrective.

The tone is concerned and urgent, emphasizing the direct impact of system failures on the lives and financial security of 800,000 people. The style is formal, addressing the Prime Minister, and utilizes logical argumentation based on concrete facts and previously given promises. The goal is to create pressure for making budget decisions.

The speaking style is analytical, detailed, and often anxious, particularly regarding IT system failures, which are described as being "on the verge of collapse." There is a strong reliance on facts, figures, and official sources (the National Audit Office, quotes from the Prime Minister). Although the speaker thanks those who raised the inquiry for bringing up the topic, he simultaneously criticizes the opposition's tone as "gloating," and calls for constructive cooperation.