By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The main target is the distrusted minister, whose actions are sharply criticized on both procedural and substantive grounds. Specifically criticized is the minister's defensive posture, where he seems to feel wronged, as well as his lack of empathy prior to media intervention. The criticism is intense and demands a self-critical response.

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party, which is accused of disregarding its ideological tenets (needs-based support) and postponing the raising of the subsistence minimum. Strong opposition is directed at the minister (the government) regarding the amendments to the Employment Contracts Act, reproaching them for ignoring the concerns of and failing to involve trade unions and professional associations (e.g., the Estonian Doctors' Association).

The criticism is directed at systemic procedural deficiencies which lead to the premature conviction of individuals and the violation of the sense of justice. Specific political opponents or groups are not being criticized.

The confrontation is directed at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, criticizing their political priorities and their refusal to immediately raise the subsistence level via a supplementary budget. The criticism is policy- and value-based, accusing the government of postponing the increase of need-based support until 2026.

Insufficient data.

The opposition is aimed squarely at the government, particularly the Reform Party, criticizing their political decision to exclude both the raising of the subsistence level and the necessary resources for improving the SKAIS system from the supplementary budget. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, warning that the delay is "very critical" and will push a large number of people into serious difficulty. It also calls the government's priorities into question, given the lack of funding for SKAIS, which currently poses a security risk.

The opposition is aimed at the deficiencies in the social welfare system, the inaction of the prosecutor's office, or the minimization of the victims' suffering, and the lack of accountability on the part of the nursing home management. The criticism is intense and demands fair punishment (imprisonment) for those who committed the crimes, not just dismissal from their jobs. Furthermore, the vague wording of the coalition agreement concerning the care reform is also being criticized.