By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The rhetorical style is direct and demanding, posing pointed questions to the minister regarding accountability and the timing of the actions. The speaker employs both procedural criticism and emotional appeal, highlighting the lack of empathy shown toward the victims. He/She notes the minister's initially aggressive tone but acknowledges that the responses improved toward the end of the address.

The rhetorical style is formal and well-reasoned, yet simultaneously urgent and occasionally emotional, emphasizing the critical situation that families have found themselves in. It employs both logical appeals (historical precedents, numerical examples) and moral pressure (the necessity of aiding those in distress). When faced with opposition, the tone turns critical, accusing the minister of denigrating the opponents.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, beginning with an acknowledgment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the dedicated professionals in the field. The speaker employs both emotional appeals (damaged reputation and health) and a logical framing of the issue to identify systemic solutions. The tone is measured, yet conveys concern regarding the violation of the sense of justice.

The rhetorical style is urgent and serious, emphasizing the critical nature of the situation and the necessity for immediate action before the heating season begins. Both emotional appeals (such as the poverty trap and falling into hardship) and logical arguments are utilized, referencing inflation data and earlier legislative precedent (from 2022). The address itself is formal, respectfully directed toward the presiding officer and the Prime Minister.

The tone is polite and respectful, formally addressing both the Chair and the Rapporteur. The speaker expresses optimism and hope regarding cross-party cooperation, concluding directly with a question about whether hope can be sustained.

The rhetorical style is formal, yet insistent and critical, particularly concerning the Prime Minister's positions, where he promises to "take a different view." Both logical arguments (historical precedent, inflation) and emotional appeals are used, describing the situation as a "crying necessity" and warning against the poverty trap. He employs sharp irony, stating that the system cannot be fixed "on air and love."

The rhetorical style is serious and critical, particularly regarding security in the social sector, employing both emotional arguments (dignity, respect) and logical ones (the number of deficiencies, the need for funding). Emphasis is placed on the necessity of swift action and restoring the system's credibility, going so far as to demand the incarceration of the perpetrators.