By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt
Total Sessions: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is active during the plenary session debate on the motion of no confidence, posing repeated questions to the minister. They demonstrate preparation by referencing the reading of the transcript from a previous query. This pattern of activity suggests opposition oversight and meticulousness.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is active in plenary sessions, participating in debates concerning both the supplementary budget and the Employment Contracts Act on two consecutive days. This pattern of activity involves inquiring about the committee's voting results and procedural details, as well as defending specific amendments (those submitted by the Social Democrats).
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The data only concerns one question from a plenary session, which indicates participation in the discussion of the Chief Justice's overview.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker actively participates in plenary sessions, posing questions and offering detailed positions regarding the supplementary budget procedure and formal inquiries. Their pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on submitting specific amendments and advocating strongly for their adoption.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker actively participates in the Riigikogu Q&A session, focusing on the supplementary budget discussion and posing pointed questions to the government. He/She refers to direct communication with families in need to emphasize the severity of social problems. His/Her approach involves drafting proposals for legislative amendments.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The speaker participated in structured legislative activity, referencing the parliamentary inquiry concerning the Pihlakodu case, which was submitted by 12 social democrats on April 14th. The pattern of activity indicates a consistent demand for answers and action only after the events were disclosed and time had elapsed.