By Months: Helmen Kütt

The style is formal and respectful, utilizing standard forms of address ("Honorable Chair! Esteemed Rapporteur!"). The rhetoric is primarily logical and focused on specific questions, demanding the establishment of clear criteria to prevent ad hoc decisions based purely on emotion. Concern and embarrassment are expressed regarding previous legislative failures.

The rhetorical style is formal, earnest, and detailed, focusing on policy analysis and data. The speaker balances emotional appeals (the question of self-worth) with statistics and legal references to highlight the underfunding of the social sector and the vulnerability of the elderly. He/She frequently uses questions to request additional information (for example, regarding service reporting or the service housing project).

The rhetorical style is formal, thorough, and procedural, especially in the reports of the Social Affairs Committee, where detailed information and logical argumentation dominate. The tone is respectful and geared towards cooperation (e.g., expressing gratitude to the Chancellor of Justice and the Minister), but becomes concerned when addressing waiting lists and the situation of informal caregivers. It frequently references laws, dates, and consensus decisions, which underscores its role as a facilitator in the legislative process.

The style is highly formal, polite, and conciliatory, utilizing forms of address such as "Honored Chairman" and "Esteemed [Sir/Madam/Colleague]." The speaker is deferential, apologizing in advance for the potential lack of expertise in their question. The tone is constructive and focuses on obtaining a logical clarification regarding the mandate of the Financial Supervision Authority.

The style is formal, respectful, and appreciative towards the Minister and colleagues, often employing phrases such as "Thank you very much" and "Esteemed Minister." A balanced approach is utilized, combining logical arguments (referencing statistics and legislative amendments) with ethical and emotional appeals (the necessity of leaving no one behind). The speaker tends to be historical and explanatory, detailing previous legislative achievements.

The language used is formal and respectful, employing standard forms of address ("honored chairman," "respected minister"). The style is direct and focused on the questions, containing both light irony aimed at the minister ("the glib minister") and strong recognition (thanking the veterinarians). The emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and fact-checking.

The style is formal and constructive, emphasizing cooperation and rapid processing, especially when supporting socio-political bills. Both logical arguments are used when explaining the legal amendments, as well as an emotional appeal (referencing the situation of parents and mental health issues). The speaker is optimistic about the supporting bills and calls for unanimous backing ("in unity and noble peace").

The style is formal, logical, and empathetic, focusing on the injustice inflicted upon families and the complicated administrative procedures. The speaker uses detailed references to legislation, protocols, and the positions of the Government of the Republic to support the arguments. As an emotional appeal, examples of the families' ordeal and the violation of human dignity are highlighted.