By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The rhetorical style is polite and respectful ("Honored Chairman! Respected Presenter!"), yet its substance is argumentative and critical. The speaker uses logical appeals, supporting them with practical examples, and concludes by expressing disappointment ("It's sad that you don't see") that the opposing side refuses to acknowledge the contradiction he has raised.

The rhetorical style is largely constructive, formal, and optimistic, particularly when supporting the draft legislation, where the speaker expresses "great pleasure." The speaker employs both logical arguments (explaining the law's content and history) and emotional appeal, urging unified support and backing "in noble peace." A personal historical reference (the 2014 meeting) is also utilized to establish credibility.

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, commencing with an expression of gratitude to both the presiding officer and the minister for their thoroughness. The argumentation is logical, centering on the unintended consequences of the policy and calling for studies to be conducted to improve the situation and prevent adverse emotional effects.