By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The rhetorical style is polite and optimistic regarding the adoption of the bill, expressing "great pleasure" that the draft has reached the main chamber. The speaker employs an explanatory and logical approach to correct a misconception, repeatedly stressing that this is a choice, not an obligation.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the presiding officer and the minister. The tone is appreciative of the state's activities but concludes with a specific and technical question regarding the financing of the service house project and the opening of a new round. The appeal is logical, based on the uneven functioning of the system across Estonia.

The style is formal, detailed, and analytical, relying extensively on statistics and references to draft legislation. The tone is concerned and urgent, particularly regarding the vulnerability of the elderly and the underfunding of the social sector, emphasizing the sharing of their "concern." It utilizes both logical arguments and appeals to the issue of self-dignity.