By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The political stance is social democratic, focusing strongly on the crises facing rural areas and agriculture, particularly pig farming and food security. Criticism directed at the government is robust, stressing the necessity for swift and clear state interventions to guarantee the sustainability of production. The political framework is results-oriented, demanding concrete actions rather than long-term plans. It supports achieving an 80% level of self-sufficiency in key food categories.

The political stance is highly critical of the government's priorities, particularly concerning the funding of social welfare. The speaker highlights the critical situation facing special care services and deems it illogical that large handouts are being given to high-income earners using borrowed funds, while essential sectors are left to suffer. This position is strongly performance-based, focusing on the inefficiency and lack of logic in the government's activities.

The speaker is a strong opponent of the government’s tax policy, forcefully opposing the abolition of the tax hump, which provides a €114 million tax gift to high earners. He/She emphasizes social justice and the connection between livelihood and security, demanding a significant increase in the salaries of frontline workers (police officers, rescue workers, teachers). Furthermore, a crucial priority is achieving regional language status for the South Estonian languages (Võro, Seto, Mulgi, Tarto).

The political position clearly advocates for increasing social measures (child benefits, school meals), emphasizing their necessity. However, critical focus is simultaneously directed towards budgetary responsibility and demanding concrete funding sources, demonstrating a balance between policy-driven and value-based approaches.

The speaker takes a strong position in defense of small forest owners regarding the changes to protection regulations and the accompanying "violence" this entails. He also supports exempting modified vehicles used by people with special needs from the motor vehicle tax, highlighting the public's lack of understanding regarding the current situation. These positions are aimed at promoting social justice and alleviating the regulatory burden.

The political position is strongly anti-centralization, particularly concerning the amendments to the Public Libraries Act, emphasizing their negative impact on regional life and employment. The speaker demands accountability from the government to the locals of Nursipalu and supports improving the wage levels and revenue base for local government employees (cultural workers, teachers). These standpoints are clearly value-based, focusing on regional justice and equality.

The political stance is firmly aimed at addressing the societal damage caused by quick loans, highlighting broken families and the strain placed on the social and healthcare sectors. The speaker advocates for a political solution that would remove the burden of debt management from employers and shift the responsibility for recovering the funds back onto irresponsible lenders.

The political position is centered on healthcare management and ministerial accountability. Although direct resignation is not demanded, the Health Insurance Fund is strongly urged to take concrete steps and ensure transparency to restore public trust. Criticism is drawn by the widening social divide, which is caused by debating irrelevant topics in a situation where primary care is inadequate. The position is strongly results-based and aimed at improving the system's functionality.

The political focus is currently on the balancing act between national defense requirements (the expansion of Nursipalu) and the sentiment of the local population. The speaker pragmatically accepts the state's necessity, stating, "What the state needs, must be done," but simultaneously critically emphasizes the importance of studying the local population's will to defend and adhering to court decisions. The political framework is directed toward controlling and ensuring the effectiveness of government activity.

The political position focuses on the practical concerns of the Estonian people, emphasizing the importance of food security within the context of national defense, as well as the availability of classic banking services in remote regions. The position tends to evaluate policy and effectiveness, calling into question the ministry's decisions regarding the cancellation of subsidies. Food security is considered paramount, and for this reason, small beekeepers should be left unaffected.

The speaker's political position is sharply critical of the government's actions, focusing primarily on procedural errors and the undermining of economic interests. He opposes stricter environmental regulations that have been implemented without consulting landowners, and criticizes the Ministry of Education for running large fiscal deficits while simultaneously implementing cuts in rural areas. The political framework is results-based, demanding swift and realistic action from the government when resolving crises (such as those in the pork sector).