By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

Supports strong state intervention to aid agriculture, demanding emergency assistance, wage subsidies, and compensation for destroyed produce. Economically, it advocates for lowering the VAT on foodstuffs to enhance the competitiveness of Estonian agriculture and support low-income individuals. In regional policy, it calls for a simple and cost-effective solution to issues concerning capital accessibility.

Economic perspectives emphasize the necessity of channeling state resources and borrowed funds toward addressing critical social issues. The speaker sharply criticizes the allocation of over 100 million euros as a handout to high-income earners (those making a gross salary of 4,000 euros), arguing instead that social welfare concerns should be prioritized.

The speaker is a strong advocate for social justice and income redistribution, favoring a progressive income tax and opposing tax cuts that exacerbate inequality. He/She stresses that the country is living on borrowed money and that wages are being paid using that debt, which is why funds should be directed toward the salaries of frontline workers.

The economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and the requirement for funding sources, while simultaneously supporting social redistribution aimed at assisting children and families. He/She proposes that the tax relief aimed at high earners (the abolition of the tax hump) could genuinely fund social measures.

The speaker supports granting exemptions in the motor vehicle tax for socially vulnerable groups. Furthermore, they protect the economic interests of small forest owners from regulatory pressure, signaling opposition to burdensome environmental regulations.

The speaker supports fiscal redistribution ("Robin Hood 2") to equalize the revenue bases of local municipalities, thereby ensuring fair wages for cultural and education workers. He emphasizes the need to integrate salary funding into the municipalities' revenue base during budget negotiations to guarantee proportionality between Tallinn and Võru.

Economic perspectives favor regulation in the financial sector to ease the burden on employers and protect the workforce. The speaker emphasizes the need to remove the burden of debt management from businesses in order to improve labor availability.

Insufficient data

There is not enough data.

Economic perspectives advocate for state intervention or regulation to ensure the regional availability of traditional banking services, suggesting either a shared office model or a state-run system financed by the banks. Concern is also expressed regarding the economic impact that the withdrawal of agricultural subsidies will have on small beekeepers.

The speaker defends the economic interests of forest owners, criticizing state restrictions that prevent them from earning income (for example, to cover a child's tuition fees). They demand swift and targeted support from the government for the pigmeat sector to ensure Estonia's food self-sufficiency. Furthermore, clarity is sought regarding the impact of redistributing the local government revenue base (the so-called Robin Hood measure).