By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The rhetorical style is serious, emotional, and forceful, highlighting the tragedy of war and the suffering of children. A moral appeal is employed, labeling the deportations as a war crime and stressing that war must not be allowed to become routine. The address is formal and directed towards colleagues, underscoring the significance of every step along this long path.

The style is formal, direct, and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and statistical comparisons (Estonia versus legalized countries). The speaker is inquisitorial and demands a substantive discussion, posing questions that require evidence-based answers from the minister. The tone is persistent, noting that this is the second or third attempt to submit the query.

The rhetorical style is critical, combative, and anxious, combining sharp political attacks with procedural grievances. Memorable analogies are employed (e.g., the "hairy Jesus" analogy) to illustrate the government’s incompetence. The appeals are both logical (economic statistics) and emotional, emphasizing the plight of rural residents and inequality.

The tone is urgent, critical, and visionary, emphasizing the need for immediate action and warning against "black swans." Strong contrasts are utilized (Estonia is being diminished versus the necessity of making Estonia great again), and appeals are made both to logic (economic data) and emotion (crumbling roads, closed schools). The style is formal, addressing colleagues and the presiding officer.

The style is polite and directly inquisitive, addressing the addressee by name ("Dear Kaja!"). The emphasis is on logical argumentation (the causes of inflation) and the clarification of specific procedural details. The tone is analytical and focuses on facts.