By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The primary adversaries are Russia and Belarus, whose actions involving the systematic deportation of Ukrainian children are condemned as a clear war crime. The condemnation is absolute and resolute, demanding the immediate cessation of these activities and the release of the children. The criticism is directed at the action-based aggression perpetrated by these states.

The opposition is aimed at the country's current drug policy, which has resulted in high mortality rates, and the scientific basis of the minister's claims. The criticism is political and data-driven, as the speaker challenges the minister's references to the US example and asks about the underlying research regarding the increase in mental health issues.

The main opponent is the government led by the Reform Party, which is criticized for economic failure and policies detrimental to rural life. The criticism is intense, focusing both on substantive errors (e.g., the car tax) and procedural violations (such as blocking the submission of questions in the committee). He resolutely rejects the government's proposals and moves to reject the draft bill.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government, which is accused of incompetence, economic destruction, and using the war as a cover to conceal domestic political failures. The attacks are intense and focus on the tangible results of the government's actions, such as record inflation, the closure of factories and rural schools, and the increasing number of officials.

The objection is aimed at the bill's proponent (addressed as "Kaja") due to a procedural deficiency in the legislative process, specifically regarding the availability of the impact assessment. The criticism is framed more as a question and focuses on substantive accuracy, rather than being a personal attack.