By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The most important topic is the war in Ukraine and the systematic deportation of Ukrainian children, which is being treated as a clear war crime. The political stance is strongly value-based, demanding the resolute condemnation of the actions of Russia and Belarus. Emphasis is placed on the need to increase Estonia's contribution, both through foreign policy pressure and concrete aid activities, to ensure the safe return of the children.

The political focus is on public health and reducing the number of drug deaths in Estonia, a figure that is the highest in the European Union. The speaker questions the effectiveness of the current policy and supports investigating the impact of alternative solutions, such as cannabis legalization, in order to achieve a positive shift in mortality statistics. The stance taken is moderately firm, and the policy is geared toward improving overall performance.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's economic policy, particularly regarding the car tax and general tax hikes, highlighting the 3% economic decline as a historical failure. This stance is clearly results-oriented, criticizing the deteriorating quality of life that has emerged under the leadership of the Reform Party. The speaker believes the government's actions stem from incompetence rather than malice ("they meant well, but they didn't know how").

A strong focus on security (vigorous support for Ukraine and assisting smaller nations) and the domestic economic crisis. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's incompetence, which has driven the Estonian economy into the worst shape in the European Union, and demands the active shaping of Estonia's future and a complete reboot of the country. The political framework is primarily results-based and highly critical of the current government's performance.

The political focus is currently on the economic situation (inflation) and the procedural correctness of the legislative process. The speaker acknowledges the price hike but stresses that it is due to inflation, not the fault of the hotels. The main point revolves around the absence or availability of the bill's impact assessment, highlighting the importance of the procedural framework.