By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

The criticism is aimed at the actions taken by the government and the minister regarding priority setting, particularly concerning the salaries of cultural workers compared to those of teachers. The critique is policy-based, centering on why culture isn't being advocated for as strongly as education. The intensity of the attack is moderate, staying within the bounds of posing a constructive question.

The opposition is directed at the coalition parties (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), specifically questioning their lack of alternative solutions for lowering food prices. It also criticizes the general political focus for being centered on inter-party competition rather than on finding solutions.

The confrontation is directed at the government's inaction or inefficiency in the field of specialized care services, criticizing the availability of services and working conditions. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, aimed at the head of the government.

There is not enough data. (The speaker expresses support for the minister's positions and asks constructive questions regarding implementation, rather than criticizing.)

Direct criticism is not leveled at specific political opponents. The criticism is instead aimed at systemic issues, such as the erosion of teachers' rights relative to those of parents and children, and the acceptance of a situation where the number of unqualified teachers is increasing. The Minister is praised for advocating for teachers' salaries.