By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, addressing the minister with respect while simultaneously posing a critical question regarding the setting of priorities. Specific data and historical facts concerning salary increases are utilized, providing a logical foundation for the speech. The tone remains constructive, concluding with an acknowledgment of the minister's efforts, but suggesting that further improvements could be made.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaking style is formal and questioning, respectfully addressing the presiding officer and the rapporteur. Emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and practical questions (resources, workload). It employs criticism aimed at political "jockeying" to redirect the focus toward tangible results for the Estonian people.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaking style is formal and respectful, addressing the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the Prime Minister. The tone is concerned and highlights systemic problems, but remains moderate when posing the question. The speaker employs a logical approach, acknowledging that the Prime Minister does not need to know "every number," but rather requests the articulation of the conceptual problem.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is courteous, formal, and respectful, commencing with an expression of gratitude to both the presiding officer and the Minister. The address is analytical and centers on the logical framing of the question, requiring a data-driven overview of the results of policy implementation and fiscal arrangements.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and respectful, repeatedly addressing both the Minister and the Chair of the session. Logical arguments and concrete examples of regional issues are employed to support the political demands. Although the Minister is commended for championing the salary issue, the tone becomes urgent when the reduction of teachers' rights and the normalization of unqualified teachers are addressed.