By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

Supports economic growth and improved competitiveness through the optimization of regulations and the reduction of bureaucracy. It favors renewable energy, as it is economically more competitive than expensive oil shale. It advocates for faster planning processes to facilitate investments.

The economic perspective emphasizes the significant improvement of competitiveness and strong fiscal discipline to prevent damage to the state budget through penalty payments. Delay is considered irrational waste, comparable to a service eight times more expensive than the prices charged by Tulika Takso.

Economic perspectives support targeted state intervention (support measures) only when it is necessary to ensure system stability and reduce the average price of electricity. It is stressed that any support measure must lower the price by more than its cost (0.24 cents/kWh). The speaker advocates for fiscal discipline, opposing mere subsidization, and views electrification as a source of consumption growth.

Insufficient data.

Supports economic growth based on added value, productivity, export, and strong research and development (R&D). It favors targeted state investments (e.g., support for R&D employees, the large investment scheme) and opposes blanket subsidies, especially in the energy sector, where the goal is a competitive total price. The need to reduce bureaucracy is emphasized.