By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The discourse is analytical and corrective, stemming from the necessity of "rearranging things slightly." The emphasis is placed on logical arguments and data, utilizing specific pricing structures and procedural explanations. The tone is formal and centers on the urgency of reducing bureaucracy and accelerating processes.

The style is urgent and rational, centered on emphasizing the financial ramifications and delivering a practical solution. An extended, memorable analogy (the expensive, ticking taxi meter) is employed to illustrate the price of indecision and the necessity of a rapid resolution. The tone is persuasive and geared toward action.

The rhetorical style is analytical, corrective, and explanatory, focusing on refuting claims presented by others and clarifying specific aspects. The tone is factual and logical, relying heavily on data and explaining market mechanisms (specifically, how the support measure drives the price down). Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed solely on rational justification.

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and focuses on logical arguments and technical details. The speaker poses direct, specific questions to the minister in order to assess the legal resilience of the draft bill and mitigate potential risks. The tone is matter-of-fact and concerned regarding the possible incomplete transposition of the directive.

The speaker’s style is analytical, measured, and businesslike, focusing on logical arguments and the enumeration of specific government programs. The tone is moderately optimistic, acknowledging challenges (e.g., the high cost of capital, skills shortages) but emphasizing immediately implementable solutions. Specific examples are used (1,400 supported experts), and expert reports are referenced.