By Months: Annely Akkermann

The style is highly formal, informative, and procedure-oriented, befitting a representative of the steering committee. The speaker relies on logical arguments, citing explanatory memoranda and specific sections of the law, and while answering colleagues' questions, remains defensive yet resolute. He favors a fact-based approach, rejecting emotional comparisons (such as equating lawyers' discussions with a puppy).

Uses a polite and formal tone, beginning with traditional forms of address. Presents philosophical questions, which demonstrates a reflective approach. The style is more exploratory than argumentative, focusing on the gathering of knowledge.

Employs a factual and technically precise style, relying on numerical data and legal references. Maintains a formal and neutral tone even when delivering criticism, avoiding emotional expressions. Structures arguments logically, beginning with an overview and concluding with specific findings. Occasionally uses irony ("the tax festival is over") and demands factually accurate claims from the opposing side.

Uses a factual, analytical approach, relying on statistics and concrete examples. The style is formal and technically precise but also includes emotional moments (such as biblical references when advocating for solar energy). Humor and personal experiences (entrepreneurial experience since 1991) are sometimes used to reinforce arguments.

Adopts a formal and fact-based approach, relying heavily on data and expert opinions. The style is explanatory and pedagogical, especially when addressing land tax issues. They honestly acknowledge the limits of their knowledge by stating directly, "I don't know" or "I cannot answer," which demonstrates honest and transparent communication.

The speaker relies on factual, numerical argumentation, steering clear of emotional rhetoric. The style is formal and technically precise, frequently referencing specific data and legal acts. He/She openly acknowledges the limitations of their viewpoints ("I don't really have a better answer") and occasionally employs a light ironic tone, particularly when engaging with the opposition.