By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

The style is highly formal and respectful, addressing both the chairperson and the presenter with due deference. The tone is analytical and substantive, expressing gratitude for the presentation ("for the brief, yet meaningful presentation"). The speaker focuses on a logical and policy-related question.

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, beginning with a respectful address and thanking the presenter. The speaker employs a logical and data-driven approach, presenting statistics on the scope of the problem. The question concludes with a straightforward, slightly colloquial phrase ("the carrot and the stick") to clarify the implementation methods.

The speaker's style is predominantly formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on facts, dates, and the commission's decisions. The appeals are primarily logical and data-driven, clarifying the background and impact of the legal amendments. A personal tone is also present, especially regarding the inefficiency of tax benefits, expressing regret that the subsidies fail to precisely reach the target audience, and defending the continuous improvement of legislation as routine, daily work.