By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

The speaker uses fact-based and technically precise argumentation, relying on specific figures and statistics. The tone is usually formal and explanatory, but it sharpens when debating the opposition. Speeches often conclude with a direct call to support the proposed legislation or by correcting the opponent's assertions with factual evidence ("Andrei Korobeinik, don't just talk like that. Speak the truth!").

It employs an official, fact-based, and explanatory tone, focusing on data rather than emotional appeals. It answers questions in a structured and detailed manner, often referencing specific documents and the voting protocol. Political assessments of local government decisions are avoided, with repeated emphasis placed on procedure and the limits of competence.

They utilize questioning as the primary tool of rhetorical influence, structuring their address as three consecutive questions. The style is polite and formal, beginning with expressions of gratitude directed toward the presenter. The approach is analytical and fact-based, focusing on specific problems and solutions.

It employs an official, fact-based, and neutral tone. The discourse is structured and rich in information, focusing on procedural details and commission discussions. Emotional elements are absent, with the emphasis placed on logic and accuracy.