By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

Sharply criticizes the Social Democrats and Isamaa, claiming they are addressing the wrong item on the agenda. Rejects Andrei Korobeinik’s personal attacks concerning the salary issue, using calculations to refute his claims. Firmly opposes the amendments proposed by the opposition factions, justifying this stance by referencing government policy.

Rejects the amendments proposed by the Isamaa faction due to formal deficiencies, noting that similar proposals have been repeatedly submitted in the past. It opposes the Social Democrats' proposals to utilize the government reserve for social expenditures, relying on the government's position not to generate additional spending. The criticism is primarily procedural and fact-based, rather than personal.

Due to the lack of sufficient data, it is impossible to evaluate the opposition's stance.

It does not criticize direct opponents, but implicitly supports measures against Russia related to the violation of the treaty. The position is reactive rather than aggressive, relying on legal bases.