By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann
Total Sessions: 58
Fully Profiled: 58
2025-11-11
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data. The criticism is aimed more at the inefficiency of government systems and the poor data submission compliance among more than half of the private limited companies, rather than at specific political opponents.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Criticism is primarily directed at the procedural shortcomings of the opposition (Isamaa) when they submitted a non-compliant amendment proposal to the supplementary budget regarding a 200 million euro cost reduction, lacking specific wording. Also criticized is the "thoughtless choice of words" by politicians (referring to Kristina Kallas) concerning the cancellation of the car tax, which is disrupting business in the automotive sector. Questions from the opposition are answered directly, defending the fundamental fairness of the car tax.
2025-10-21
15th Riigikogu, Sixth Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker does not express personal opposition or criticize any political grouping or policy. He notes that one committee member was against the completion of the first reading, but this constitutes a neutral factual report.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is mainly directed at Isamaa (for the ironic interpretation of their previous budget recommendations) and EKREIKE (for the large prior deficit of 5.2% of GDP). It disputes the mathematical and definitional claims made by opponents, especially regarding the benefit of abolishing the tax hump for the wealthy and the definition of "governance costs." Furthermore, it rejects the bill initiated by the Center Party parliamentary group concerning motor vehicle tax concessions.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is directed at the misconceptions and criticism put forth by colleagues, particularly concerning the difficulties in the coalition's work and the technical details of fund reimbursement. It rejects accusations of neglecting people with disabilities, highlighting a 14 million euro increase in support payments. It defends the legislative process, asserting that critics have "completely misunderstood" something.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The discussions do not reveal direct opposition or criticism toward other politicians or groups. The speaker focuses on constructive legislative work without confrontational rhetoric.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Sharply criticizes the Social Democrats and Isamaa, claiming they are addressing the wrong item on the agenda. Rejects Andrei Korobeinik’s personal attacks concerning the salary issue, using calculations to refute his claims. Firmly opposes the amendments proposed by the opposition factions, justifying this stance by referencing government policy.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Rejects the amendments proposed by the Isamaa faction due to formal deficiencies, noting that similar proposals have been repeatedly submitted in the past. It opposes the Social Democrats' proposals to utilize the government reserve for social expenditures, relying on the government's position not to generate additional spending. The criticism is primarily procedural and fact-based, rather than personal.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Due to the lack of sufficient data, it is impossible to evaluate the opposition's stance.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It does not criticize direct opponents, but implicitly supports measures against Russia related to the violation of the treaty. The position is reactive rather than aggressive, relying on legal bases.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Consistently rejects tax cut proposals put forth by opposition members (especially Siim Pohlak and Rain Epler). Criticizes Isamaa's earlier tax policy decisions, particularly the implementation of the "tax hump" (maksuküür), which he/she claims harmed working pensioners. Uses fact-based arguments to refute the opposition's standpoints.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It sharply criticizes the national conservative party, which uses the term "juhuenergia" (intermittent energy) when referring to renewable energy. The opposition is principled and ideological, emphasizing the illogical nature of their opponents' arguments. It also criticizes proponents of the oil shale industry who disregard environmental impacts and present oil shale as a "free" alternative.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He directly criticizes the claims made by his colleague Urmas Reinsalu regarding the decline in residents' well-being, labeling them "simplistic political assertions" and questioning the source of such data. The opposition is fact-based and moderate, focusing on challenging the data rather than resorting to personal attacks.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the bill initiated by the Isamaa faction, but the criticism is strictly policy-focused, not personal. It relies on the unanimous position of the Government of the Republic and emphasizes that circumstances justifying the need for changes are lacking. The opposition is moderate, but firm.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker does not express direct opposition, but rather questions and seeks clarification, implicitly pointing to potential issues concerning the gender balance in schools and hospitals.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker criticized the low participation of EKRE members in the Finance Committee meetings, noting that "EKRE members very rarely attend the Finance Committee sessions." He/She rejected the tax policy proposals put forward by both Isamaa and EKRE, but did so using substantive arguments rather than resorting to personal attacks.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Criticizes the Isamaa faction's proposed amendments, deeming them formally incorrect and non-compliant with the requirements set forth in the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure Act. Rejects the Center Party's substantial expenditure proposals, justifying the decision by stating that the Government's reserve cannot be depleted before the start of the fiscal year. Makes an ironic remark directed at Urmas Reinsalu, suggesting that he should learn the proper procedure for drafting amendments.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticizes the amendments proposed by the Isamaa faction as technically infeasible and non-compliant with legislative requirements. Expresses criticism towards the government, which fails to execute the will of the Riigikogu and uses allocated funds for purposes other than those planned. The stance is procedural rather than personal.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
He/She criticized the Isamaa faction’s proposals regarding the decision to drop the abolition of the tax hump and income tax concessions, although he/she admitted that it would have been fairer not to have introduced the tax hump at all. The opposition was primarily politically motivated, not personal.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
He/She sharply criticizes the amendments proposed by Isamaa and EKRE, labeling them formally defective and non-compliant with the law. EKRE is accused of abandoning the performance-based budget after having introduced it themselves. Furthermore, he/she dismisses allegations regarding the budget's illegality, referencing the Constitutional Review Chamber.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
He criticizes the opposition's assertion that tax increases are stifling economic growth, offering the counterargument that state subsidies and money injected into the economy through borrowing are 2.5 times greater than the amount collected via taxes. He also criticizes the then-government of 2018–2019 for depleting reserves during a period of strong economic performance. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, not personal.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Notes that Martin Helme and Aivar Kokk voted against the amendments to the Income Tax Act in the Finance Committee. At the same time, strong criticism is not expressed toward the opposition; instead, the focus is on providing factual answers to their questions. The attitude is rather neutral and professional than confrontational.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Takes a distinctly opposing stance regarding the Isamaa faction's proposal, labeling their suggested tax hump a "fictional tax curve." It criticizes Isamaa's conduct for submitting an identical draft bill, yet maintains a formal tone, avoiding personal attacks.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
It criticizes the obstructionist behavior of the opposition parties, specifically citing EKRE's submission of 200 amendments and technically flawed proposals. It refers to the Supreme Court's positions regarding obstruction and justifies the necessity of bundling the amendments to ensure the working capacity of the Riigikogu (Parliament). Nevertheless, an official tone is maintained when presenting the criticism.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker is criticizing the opposition for submitting 831 amendments, labeling the move as obstructionist behavior that makes any substantive discussion impossible. He contrasts this with the President's constructive criticism, which he believes is both debatable and implementable. The criticism itself is primarily procedural, not personal.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
Criticizes the Isamaa faction's proposed amendments as "doubly populist" and technically unfeasible. The speaker rejects accusations regarding budget errors, pointing out that the 2023 budget had also received support from the Isamaa faction. Nevertheless, a courteous and professional tone is maintained even when delivering criticism.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
He/She criticizes the Isamaa faction's amendments, calling them vague and legally flawed. He/She further accuses opposition members of presenting populist proposals that lack concrete solutions. He/She stresses that the opposition is unable to specify exactly where funds should be saved, instead relying solely on general slogans.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker does not express direct opposition to specific individuals or groups, but rather focuses on presenting systemic criticism regarding the inadequacy of the current regulation. The criticism is constructive and aimed at improving policy, not personal attacks.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
He/She moderately challenges the opposition's criticism, arguing that the draft bill has shifted to become more favorable to the taxpayer. Specifically, he/she corrects Urmas Reinsalu's erroneous claims concerning the cumulation of the registration fee. He/She does not employ sharp rhetoric, choosing instead to focus on clarifying the facts and correcting falsehoods.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It notes the criticism by opposition member Aivar Kokk regarding the sufficiency of the austerity measures, but does not take a clear stance on whether this criticism is justified or unfounded. It treats the opposition's position neutrally, presenting it as a fact.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It criticizes the obstructionist tactics employed by the opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE, Center Party), specifically mentioning the submission of 831 proposed amendments. It further accuses the opposition of a lack of constructiveness, asserting that they failed to agree on any alternatives even within their own factions. The text dismisses claims regarding the cumulative nature of the registration fee, labeling Urmas Reinsalu's statements as erroneous.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker indirectly criticizes those who recommend taking out more loans and "completing the construction of the state," but avoids naming specific opponents. The criticism targets policy measures rather than individuals, focusing on the dangers of misguided economic policy. He mentions that Jürgen Ligi’s warnings against indexation have become "a voice crying in the wilderness."
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
A direct opposition stance is not evident in the speeches. Instead, it defends the actions of the government and the commission against criticism, emphasizing the correctness of the procedure and the exemplary pace. Criticism is met calmly, with an attempt to clarify the rationale behind the decisions.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
No direct criticism is leveled at specific individuals or parties. Rather, it points to a systemic problem where various European directives contradict one another. It implicitly criticizes the banking sector's overly casual approach to account closures.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker criticizes the conduct of those making presentations, who, in his view, personally attack colleagues and ministers instead of offering substantive arguments. The criticism is procedural and behavioral, not personal, focusing instead on the quality of parliamentary debate.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The amendments proposed by the opposition factions (Isamaa and EKRE) are rejected, based on the unsuitability of using the Government of the Republic’s reserves to cover standing expenditures. The criticism is procedural and fiscal, not personal.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
It expresses clear opposition to Russia's actions in Ukraine, using emotionally charged vocabulary ("sowing suffering, death, and destruction with bombs"). The criticism is presented on a moral, rather than a political, basis.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Does not express direct criticism of political opponents, but notes the withdrawal of EKRE's 200 amendments in a neutral tone. Supports the review of Isamaa's proposals, even though the committee decided not to endorse them. Overall, confrontational rhetoric is avoided, with the focus instead being on finding technical solutions.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
It does not offer direct criticism towards specific individuals or political parties, but it is clearly opposed to the VAT reduction proposal put forward by the Estonian Conservative People's Party. The criticism is policy-focused rather than personal, concentrating on the substantive lack of justification for the proposal.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
No direct opposition stance is expressed; rather, the emphasis is on achieving compromise and making consensual decisions. It notes that the constitutional institutions initially sought a stricter approach, but a balanced solution was found that also considers the government's obligations.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Does not express direct opposition to specific individuals or groups. It raises critical questions regarding state support in the energy sector, but does so constructively, seeking clarification on policy directions.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The text offers polite criticism regarding the minister's claims concerning the comparison of education expenditures, highlighting methodological deficiencies. It also casts doubt on the proposal to extend compulsory education, suggesting an alternative approach.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Avoids direct confrontation, focusing instead on factual analysis and procedural matters. It notes that the commission recommended rejecting the bill, but delivers this point in a neutral tone without resorting to personal attacks.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The text criticizes obstructionist behavior within the legislature, specifically referencing "obstructionist bills" and their inadequate preparation. It also voices criticism regarding general subsidies that fail to reach the most vulnerable groups. Direct personal attacks are absent.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
It avoids expressing direct criticism toward specific individuals or groups. Instead, it neutrally conveys the government's opposition to the proposed bills, citing their negative impact on tax revenue. The opposition is political rather than personal, focusing primarily on budgetary considerations.
2024-02-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker offers no direct criticism of individuals or parties but mentions specific voting results where Martin Helme, Aivar Kokk, Siim Pohlak, and Kersti Sarapuu voted against the commission's proposals. The opposition is procedural rather than ideological.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker expresses opposition to the practice of visiting Lääneranna municipality and subsequently working against the local government regarding the merging of small schools. The criticism is directed more towards the methods being used than the individuals involved.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition is primarily targeting the income tax reduction proposals initiated by EKRE, which are being criticized both substantively and procedurally. They criticize the inadequate preparation of the draft legislation and the lack of analysis concerning the economic consequences, especially regarding how budget deficits would be covered.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker takes a categorically negative stance on the bills initiated by EKRE, supporting the rejection of all of them at the first reading. The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-focused, not personal. The speaker ironically points out EKRE's internal contradictions regarding tax rates.