By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

He/She employs a factual and analytical approach, drawing on figures and international comparisons. The style is straightforward, sometimes carrying an ironic undertone, particularly when addressing the opposition. Concrete examples and mathematical calculations are used to substantiate his/her positions, such as the price comparison of Latvian vegetables.

Uses a formal and polite tone, addressing colleagues with expressions of respect ("dear colleagues," "dear Rain, dear colleague"). The style is concrete and businesslike, focusing on facts and procedural questions. Emotional expressions are avoided, preferring a neutral and professional approach.

The speaking style is emotional and persuasive, blending humor (with audience laughter), religious references, and scientific facts. He uses rhetorical questions ("What exactly is intermittent energy?") and irony directed at the opponents' arguments. The style is direct and passionate, yet supported by concrete facts. He concludes with an emphatic summary regarding the true costs of oil shale.

Adopts an optimistic and fact-based approach, relying on statistical data and economic indicators. The tone is formal and professional, incorporating appreciative phrases such as, "one must take one's hat off to Estonian companies." It combines technical explanations with emotional appeals, highlighting Estonia's success and resilience during crises.