By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

Consistently rejects tax cut proposals put forth by opposition members (especially Siim Pohlak and Rain Epler). Criticizes Isamaa's earlier tax policy decisions, particularly the implementation of the "tax hump" (maksuküür), which he/she claims harmed working pensioners. Uses fact-based arguments to refute the opposition's standpoints.

There is insufficient data.

It sharply criticizes the national conservative party, which uses the term "juhuenergia" (intermittent energy) when referring to renewable energy. The opposition is principled and ideological, emphasizing the illogical nature of their opponents' arguments. It also criticizes proponents of the oil shale industry who disregard environmental impacts and present oil shale as a "free" alternative.

He directly criticizes the claims made by his colleague Urmas Reinsalu regarding the decline in residents' well-being, labeling them "simplistic political assertions" and questioning the source of such data. The opposition is fact-based and moderate, focusing on challenging the data rather than resorting to personal attacks.