By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of historical ideological and scientific movements by drawing parallels with the scientific justification of communism, Lysenkoism, and Michurinism. This historical understanding is employed to support a critique of the current situation, highlighting the dangers of ideological pressure.

Demonstrates knowledge of international election interference and intelligence operations, referencing specific cases (Romania) and sources (a British intelligence front organization). Uses political terminology such as "information operation" and "post-democratic era," and criticizes the inconsistency of OSCE observer assessments.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the economic challenges facing agriculture, highlighting the high costs of inputs and labor, coupled with limited market opportunities. He/She is aware of specific environmental regulations, such as the planned ban on caged hens, and possesses a broader understanding of geopolitical risks (the future of NATO and the EU).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in security policy, addressing both broad geopolitical concepts (Intermarium, power politics) and specific defense capability issues (maritime capacity, analysis of helicopter requirements). He/She poses detailed questions regarding energy infrastructure (the operational plan for the gas power plant, capacity, gas supply, and reservoirs), referencing previous analyses and plans.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of state secret regulations (referencing secrets marked 'Internal Use' (AK) and those with specific security classifications), the management crises and corruption (specifically, the fraudulent transfer of funds) within state-owned enterprises (Nordica, Estonian Air), and strategic issues related to defense force procurements, drawing on the war experiences of the last three years. Furthermore, the speaker is aware of the National Audit Office's limited capacity to audit all official expenditures.