By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The pattern of behavior involves protesting and heckling during the plenary session, which indicates a readiness to use direct and disruptive methods for expressing dissent. The speech was delivered in response to the minister's previous address, highlighting a reactive and critical role.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The address was delivered during the information hour of the plenary session of the Riigikogu, where the speaker posed repeated questions and leveled accusations against the respondent. The pattern indicates the platform was utilized for sharp criticism of the positions held by the government and fellow party members, linking these criticisms to personal political history.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The data shows participation in the plenary session on January 21, 2025, where the individual delivered both a personal address (after being recognized) and questioned the Chairman of the Rural Affairs Committee. This pattern of activity suggests active participation in debates, especially when the topic concerns national security or economic competitiveness.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker's pattern of activity is aimed at holding the government accountable during the information hour, posing complex and detailed questions. Reference is made to previous actions, such as giving an interview to Finnish journalists in 2020 and participating in the government, during which an analysis of helicopter capability was developed and a large border guard vessel was commissioned.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speeches were delivered during the debate of the plenary session. The speaker referenced a previous working lunch with Estonian pig farmers, which had taken place during the term of the previous Riigikogu (Parliament), illustrating prior engagement with representatives of specific economic sectors. It was also noted that the issue of classification has been repeatedly debated in the Riigikogu, but no tangible results have been achieved.