By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The speaking style is extremely combative, passionate, and forceful, employing strong emotional judgments and exaggerations (e.g., "that is complete absurdity!", "it's sheer madness!"). The appeals are primarily based on rationality and sovereignty, accusing opponents of Orwellian language ("peace is war, scarcity is welfare"). Direct and aggressive labeling is used, referring to the prime minister as the "usurping prime minister" and coalition members as "stone-faced" figures.

The rhetorical style is confrontational and critical, using emotionally charged terms such as "climate fraud" and "collapse." The speaker employs a rhetorical question to dismantle the logic of the opponent's argument and relies on an external authority (US President Trump) to confirm their position.

The style is highly combative, dramatic, and cautionary, relying on powerful emotional appeals. The speaker employs extreme comparisons (Stalinism, North Korea, Putin's Russia) to underscore the decline of the rule of law. While the beginning references historical practice, the speech rapidly escalates into an alarming warning about the demise of the Estonian state. It concludes with a direct insult aimed at the intellectual capacity of the audience.

The speaker employs a passionate and urgent style, utilizing both logical arguments (such as the drop in food security percentages) and emotional appeals concerning the necessity of preserving rural life. Illustrative examples and historical digressions are employed (the story of the raccoon dog, fur hats) to underscore the multi-layered nature of the issues. The conclusion delivers a clear and powerful value-based message: "As long as the Estonian village lives, the Estonian nation lives."

The style of rhetoric is extremely aggressive, accusatory, and emotional, using strongly contemptuous language (e.g., "brazen self-will," "fascism-tinged attitude"). Dramatic exaggerations and historical parallels (Goebbels, Mengele) are used to label opponents as promoting political activism and human experimentation. Instead of logical arguments, emphasis is placed on personal experiences and suspicions (e.g., personal gain derived from the vaccine campaign).

The rhetorical style is extremely aggressive, accusatory, and emotional, using sharp expressions such as ‘you are lying to the public,’ ‘scandalous,’ and ‘childish.’ The speaker employs irony and cultural comparisons (e.g., Confucian collective responsibility) to expose the opponents’ demagoguery. The tone is urgent and and demands immediate action, contrasting quiet and determined work with the government’s "war hysteria" and "bellowing."

The speaker's style is factual, inquisitive, and concerned, focusing on a specific economic problem. A logical appeal is employed to assess the threat posed by counterfeit honey to domestic competition. The tone is formal and directed toward obtaining information regarding the severity of the market situation.

The tone is predominantly combative, accusatory, and insistent, utilizing strong and emotional expressions such as "authoritarian power," "trampling the Riigikogu of the Republic of Estonia underfoot," and "you smirk/jeer." The speaker frequently appeals to the principles of the rule of law and the supremacy of the law, while simultaneously criticizing opponents' arguments as "childish talk" or "kindergarten level." Rhetorical questions and hyperbole (e.g., whether to set oneself on fire) are employed to emphasize the seriousness of the situation and the level of despair.