By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The confrontation is aimed at the government and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, whose legitimacy and trustworthiness are directly called into question because of the e-elections. The criticism is both procedural (an unaudited system, lack of legal clarity) and personal/existential (the designation of the Prime Minister as a security threat). Compromise is ruled out until the deficiencies are eliminated or e-voting is discontinued.

The confrontation is aimed at the drafters of the bill, who are being criticized for a rigid and unjust approach that fails to take into account the specific characteristics of the residents. The criticism is intense and politically driven, demanding the withdrawal of the bill and the introduction of differentiation, which rules out any compromise with the current form of the legislation.

The confrontation is intense and aimed directly at the minister (Liisa-Ly Pakosta) and the coalition partners (Reformierakond, Eesti 200), who are accused of "closing ranks" and engaging in "mafia" activities. The criticism is both personal (lying, stupidity, "half a brain") and political (incompetence, avoiding responsibility). Compromise is ruled out; the immediate resignation of the minister and the entire government, along with their departure from politics, is being demanded.

A strong opposition is directed against the actions of the coalition, which is being criticized for violating legislative norms during the processing of the draft bill. The criticism is procedural and intense, labeling the situation as unlawful and demanding the nullification of the bill and the imposition of sanctions.

The main opponents are the current government, especially Prime Minister Kristen Michal and other ministers (e.g., Liisa Pakosta). The criticism is intense and multi-layered, covering political dishonesty (lying about taxes), procedural steamrolling (of local governments), and even hints of corruption. There is no willingness to compromise; quite the opposite, there is an expressed desire to jail today's "corrupt officials" in the future.

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the Reform Party, who are accused of incompetence, corruption, and holding office merely by the grace of the country's true leaders. The criticism is intense and personal, referencing Michal's earlier scandals ("plastic bags and white sweaters"). He also criticizes the representative of the Social Democrats (the "Sotsi-boy") for talking utter nonsense.

The confrontation is extremely intense, directed against the Reform Party-led "Ref Yoke Government" and "liberals," who are accused of hypocrisy and creating corrupt schemes (e.g., the SALK case). Particularly sharp criticism is aimed at the ERJK, which is considered an organization hijacked by the Social Democrats and ideologically biased, specifically naming Liisa Oviir and Kaarel Tarand. Compromise is ruled out, emphasizing the necessity of liquidating the regime.

The confrontation with the government is intense and conceptual, accusing the government and the Bank of Estonia of being detached from reality and engaging in propagandistic activities. The criticism targets political failures in economic management, the neglect of food security, and the loss of control over internal security due to immigration. No willingness to compromise is evident in the text.