By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The speaker actively participated in the plenary session, raising procedural points (requesting the floor) and taking part in the debate, which focused on the minister's suitability and security issues. Reference was made to his previous actions as minister (the Lihula shooting, the readiness of rapid response units).

The speaker is highly active during Riigikogu sessions, responding immediately to the recent statements and conduct of government members. Reference is made to specific events, such as Jürgen Ligi's three appearances in the same week and the interpellation filed on Monday, all of which demonstrate continuous engagement in parliamentary duties.

The speaker actively participates in the debates of the Riigikogu plenary session, addressing direct questions and counter-arguments to the minister. This pattern involves criticizing the respondent for failing to provide a substantive answer and accepting the political confrontation inherent in the debate. Previous experience standing at the rostrum as a minister is also mentioned.

The speaker is active during the Riigikogu plenary session, posing repeated questions and making remarks related to a single topic, which suggests participation in debates on interpellations or draft legislation. Previous involvement in border negotiations is mentioned, as are conversations held with Riigikogu technical staff during the session.

The data indicates vigorous activity during one plenary session, where repeated and detailed questions were raised on various topics (security, culture, police logistics). A defining characteristic was the swift and repeated rebuttal of the minister's counterarguments, alongside the submission of questions demanding specific financial figures.

The presentation was held during the Riigikogu information hour, where both parliamentary procedural matters and recent media coverage (the Sinimäe event on 'Kuuuurija') were discussed. Data regarding other activity patterns, such as frequency of appearances or travel, is unavailable.

The pattern of activity shows active participation in asking questions during the plenary session, with all interventions concentrated on a single date (2024-10-15). Data regarding other activities or frequency patterns is lacking.

The submitted speeches are part of the plenary session discussion regarding the bill for the formation of a special committee, with the speaker participating as an active supporter and advocate. Other activity patterns, the frequency of their addresses, or events that occurred outside the Riigikogu are not discernible from these speeches.