By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The criticism is aimed more at the widespread notion that national debt is safe or insignificant, referencing the naïve question, "So what?" posed by those in the discussion. Specific political opponents or groups are neither named nor criticized.

The main criticism is directed at previous governments ("the various people in the government here on my left hand"), who are accused of failing to conduct the regular valuation of land for 20 years. This inaction, in the speaker's estimation, has caused the painful impact of the current land tax. Regarding nuclear energy, he criticizes the bill's proponent for illogical policymaking, where support precedes research.

There is not enough data.

No data available. The address is a neutral commission report that contains no criticism or confrontation toward any political group.

The criticism is directed at banks that close accounts without substantive argumentation, citing only laws (the Credit Institutions Act or the Law of Obligations Act), and at the system that makes taking legal action too expensive. The officialdom is also mentioned for legally hindering the establishment of a financial ombudsman, citing various viewpoints.

The main opponents are the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE), which initiated the debate, and previously the Centre Party, which is accused of running a long-term campaign against e-voting. The criticism is intense and political, arguing that the opponents' doubts stem from unfavorable election results, not facts. The speaker believes that this activity poses a direct threat to democracy, as it calls the legitimacy of the government into question.

The main opponents are those members of the Riigikogu who are attempting to defend the controversial statement issued by the Russian community and do not support the proposal mentioned by the speaker. The criticism is intense and ideological, calling into question the opponents' understanding and loyalty. The speaker asks directly if the opponents grasp who or what they are actually standing up for.