By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

There is too little data.

Not enough data

The speaker refers to collaboration with colleagues, mentioning the defense industry support group led by Raimond Kaljulaid, thereby demonstrating a readiness to tackle issues within working groups. They are also interested in cooperating with government institutions, inquiring whether business concerns are being heard and if the Economic Affairs Committee has been approached.

The style of cooperation is highly consensual and collegial, emphasizing that all procedural decisions in the Social Affairs Committee were made unanimously and by consensus. He reports on the cooperation with both the Minister of Social Protection and the officials of the Social Insurance Board during the discussion of the draft bill. He was himself appointed as the representative of the lead committee.

The speaker expresses clear support for the Chancellor of Justice's proposal and thanks him/her for raising the issue. Colleagues are urged to continue the discussion regarding the establishment of a financial ombudsman, citing the readiness for inter-institutional cooperation (involving the Chancellor of Justice and the Financial Supervision Authority) in finding solutions.

The speaker references previous coalition experience, noting that EKRE had the chance to thoroughly audit the e-voting system while they were in government, but they failed to find any evidence of fraud. This demonstrates a willingness to weaponize political history to discredit opponents. There is no direct expression of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation in the current debate; instead, the necessity of preserving e-voting is stressed.

The speaker clearly supports the rapporteur's position and the proposal around which the debate revolves. The collaborative style is supportive towards those who share concerns about the dangers of the Russian World ideology. Information regarding broader coalitions or a willingness to compromise is lacking.