By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker demonstrates profound legal and constitutional expertise by thoroughly addressing the presumption of innocence within the context of criminal proceedings. They employ technical terms such as "statement of fact" and "value judgment" and cite rulings from the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court. Furthermore, they are well-versed in the constitutional commentaries concerning the presidential age requirement.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the legal field, focusing on the Code of Administrative Procedure, the significance of court hearing minutes, and the operational procedures of the electoral commission. They use technical terminology such as "the course of the proceedings" and "statements by the parties," underscoring the importance of procedural details when rendering legal decisions.

The speaker demonstrates detailed expertise in the area of suffrage and constitutional interpretation, referencing Article 60 of the Constitution and Supreme Court proceedings. He/She focuses on the technical and procedural specificities of elections (the face verification required for paper ballots versus the ID card validity check for e-voting) and presents detailed legal arguments.

The speaker exhibits profound knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and constitutional law, citing specific sections (e.g., § 102 subsection 2 and § 13 subsection 1). Furthermore, he demonstrates semiotic and historical awareness regarding the phrasing and impact of the police officer's oath, explaining the significance of the words "rahvas" (the people), "Eesti Vabariik" (the Republic of Estonia), and "jääda" (to remain).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in parliamentary procedural law and internal rules of procedure, citing a specific section (§ 83) concerning the expression of views during a vote. Furthermore, legal awareness regarding the hierarchy and significance of laws of constitutional importance is highlighted.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures (good law-making practice) and constitutional law, specifically citing Sections 12 and 22 of the Constitution (PS) to challenge the Riigikogu’s powers concerning the administration of justice. Furthermore, specific figures and institutions (ESTDEV, 101 million euros, Moldova, Georgia) are utilized in the critique of foreign aid.