By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The political position heavily focuses on defending the presumption of innocence against media and public condemnation, viewing it as a crucial fundamental right. Furthermore, the speaker expresses strong skepticism regarding the competence of the Riigikogu Finance Committee, accusing them of making decisions detrimental to the state. The emphasis on the role of maturity and life experience in political office is also significant. The speaker's overall approach is strongly values-based and legalistic.

The political focus is centered on the principles of the rule of law and procedural transparency, particularly concerning the level of detail in court hearing protocols. He criticizes the past practice of the electoral commission, where the protocol underpinning the decision was inaccurate and incomplete, stressing the necessity of adhering to the Administrative Procedure Code. The position is heavily procedural and aimed at institutional performance.

The political position centers on guaranteeing the uniformity and secrecy of elections, while maintaining strong opposition to e-voting. The speaker argues that e-elections violate constitutional principles (citing concerns over identity verification and the potential for vote alteration) and demands their abolition. The political framework is heavily value-based and procedural, focusing on ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.

The political position strongly focuses on the legality of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) Rules of Procedure and adherence to procedural norms, sharply opposing the exceeding of committee mandates. The second main focus is national sovereignty and security, which is highlighted in the draft bill amending the police officer's oath, alongside concerns regarding the influence of EU citizens in local elections. The speaker frames their viewpoints strongly based on core values, emphasizing the supremacy of the constitutional order and the will of the people.

The political position focuses heavily on adhering to the working procedures and constitutional principles of the Riigikogu, emphasizing the necessity of equal treatment for all members of Parliament. The speaker considers the amendment of the Riigikogu Elections Act a matter of constitutional significance, viewing it as one of the fundamental pillars of state governance. This stance is strongly procedural and value-based, requiring strict compliance with the Rules of Procedure.

The political position is strongly anti-government, sharply criticizing the tax policy—which is described as a "strangling noose" for the Estonian people—and the distribution of taxpayer money abroad. A firm stand is also taken against the processing of the declaration concerning the Moscow Patriarchate, emphasizing the violation of constitutional rights and legal procedures. The viewpoints are strongly rooted in values and procedural adherence.