By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is active during plenary sessions, presenting draft legislation and participating in debates, including defending their proposal before the committee. They are prepared to answer questions and also engage in procedural disputes with the presiding officer.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker notes that he was not fortunate enough to participate in the candidate's earlier discussions, which suggests the feeling that he has been left out of the preparatory work. There is insufficient data regarding the frequency or rhythm of his own speeches.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker actively disputes election procedures, filing complaints with the Supreme Court and sending detailed technical inquiries to the Electoral Service (Arne Koitmäe). He points to his previous success in having a case accepted for proceedings by the Supreme Court and mentions a recent inquiry, the answer to which arrived just the day before.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, making multiple appearances on a single day (May 8, 2024), addressing both procedural matters and introducing draft legislation. These appearances demonstrate intense involvement in specific debates, focusing on obstruction and challenging the legality of proceedings.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The patterns of activity indicate active participation in the plenary session, where multiple interventions were made within a short period of time. All contributions were related either to procedural issues (such as the pace of the debate or violation of the rules of procedure) or to requesting the right to speak.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
All speeches occurred during a single plenary session day (02.05.2024). This demonstrates active participation in the debates, involving the submission of repeated questions and procedural challenges concerning both tax policy and religious matters.