By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Translation is missing: Vastasseis on suunatud Justiitsministeeriumi selgituse vastu, mis puudutab EL-i poliitreklaami määruse ulatust ja selle potentsiaalset mõju meeleavaldusvabadusele. Kriitika on institutsionaalne ja poliitikapõhine, keskendudes õiguslikule tõlgendusele.

The opposition is directed at those who disregard constitutional requirements, and the criticism is procedural and legal in nature. Alar Laneman is being criticized for dismissing constitutional concerns as insignificant, while intensely stressing that the opposing party is breaking the law. No willingness to compromise is being expressed, as the matter involves a violation of the constitution.

The primary adversary is Liisa Pakosta, who faces accusations of lying regarding financial liabilities and incompetence. The presiding officer of the session, Arvo Aller, is being pressured to rule on suspending the debate, with his exclusive authority being cited. The criticism is both political (concealment of costs) and procedural (inaccessibility of documents), characterized by high intensity and personal attacks.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who face intense criticism both for their political decisions (such as squeezing the poor) and for procedural obstructions (like being absent from the chamber). Their activities are branded as "mafia-like" and geared toward globalists, signaling uncompromising opposition.