By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The political position is heavily focused on defending the constitutional order, setting it in opposition to the directly applicable regulations of the European Union. The speaker raises the issue of conflicting obligations, stressing the critical importance of freedom of speech and assembly. This is a values-based stance, which specifically challenges the Ministry of Justice’s interpretation of the EU regulation’s scope.

The political stance centers on strict adherence to constitutional principles, particularly concerning the procedure for declaring martial law and mobilization. The speaker is vehemently opposed to the current process, stressing that it violates Article 128 of the Constitution, which grants the Riigikogu (Parliament) a decisive role in authorizing the use of the Defense Forces. This position is clearly oriented toward established rules and the fundamental principles of the rule of law. The statement concludes with a somber reference to the disregard shown for the constitution.

There is strong opposition to the pending international agreement concerning financial obligations assumed by the Estonian state and the constitutional procedure for its ratification. The political focus centers on procedural correctness and the accusation that the opposing party is concealing information and being dishonest regarding cost coverage. The stance is intensely confrontational, criticizing both the policy itself (the scale of costs) and the execution (transparency).

The political position is strongly oppositional to the government's actions, which increase the financial burden and administrative complexity for citizens. Injustice towards the poor and the elderly is highlighted, criticizing the failure of draft legislation intended to raise subsistence benefits and pensions. The rhetoric is value-based (justice, constitution) and condemns the government's activities, accusing the coalition of reaching into the taxpayer's pocket.