By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and centers on the logical framing of the issue, presenting a complex legal dilemma to the Supreme Court nominee. The speaker addresses the candidate respectfully and employs sophisticated yet precise legal terminology, steering clear of emotional appeals.

The rhetorical style is serious, categorical, and slightly cautionary, focusing on logical and legal argumentation and utilizing direct constitutional citations. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes key terms ("Riigikogu – I stress once again") and concludes with a dramatic and pessimistic quote concerning the status of the constitution.

The style is highly confrontational, accusatory, and personal, charging the opposing side (Liisa Pakosta) with outright lying and casting doubt on her health. It employs strong emotional appeals and rhetorical questions, repeatedly demanding specific figures and refusing to listen to a "fairy tale." It uses a quote from the Estonian film classic ("Nukitsamees") to criticize the opposition and pressures the presiding officer to make a statesmanlike decision.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, emotional, and accusatory, employing strong historical analogies, comparing the state to the mafia of the 1990s. It appeals to justice and constitutional values, blending administrative arguments with warnings about the "new Soviet Union" desired by globalists.