By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The main opponents are the governing coalition’s MPs and officials, whose unlimited expansion of power is under criticism. The coalition is accused of deliberately disregarding established norms and acting in bad faith, in order to fulfill promises made in the coalition agreement that violate the constitution. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of ignoring fundamental legal principles.

The primary criticism is aimed at the executive branch (the minister, the police, and the Language Inspectorate) for the inconsistent enforcement of the law. There is also criticism directed at migration policies and non-Estonian speakers who demand the use of Russian in public places, which is viewed as a "very bad sign."

The primary opponents are "scientists who make up the scientific consensus." The criticism is intensely personal and psychological, calling into question the opponents' mental health and sanity. Compromise is ruled out by completely discrediting the opponents.

The opposition is directed at the implementation of the government's tax policy, which is considered an intolerable injustice, and at the activities of the Tax and Customs Board. The speaker criticizes specific colleagues (e.g., Andre Hanimägi) and political parties (EKRE, Eesti 200) ironically or bluntly for the weakness of their arguments. In the foreign policy debate, he attacks the submitters of the draft bill, accusing them of a forceful assault without specific legal evidence.

The primary opposition is directed against the inaction of the Health Board and the minister, accusing them of spreading misinformation and failing to identify the sources of danger. Specific criticism is leveled against Mari-Anne Härma, the Deputy Director General of the Health Board, for disseminating obvious false information that contradicts the laws of physics. The criticism is intense and addresses both the competence of the officials and the political negligence of the government.

The confrontation is intense and aimed at casting doubt on the motives of the opposing party, indirectly accusing them of resisting improvements in public health. The criticism is not centered on policy or procedure; instead, it attacks the opponent's will and objectives ("why don't you want the health of the Estonian people to be better").

The main opponent is Lauri Hussar, the Speaker of the Riigikogu, who is being intensely criticized for procedural unfairness and brazen conduct. The speaker also points to bias, believing that the chairman does not want him to ask questions to Michal.

The primary groups facing criticism are the ministers of the Government of the Republic, the Chancellor of Justice, and the Prosecutor’s Office, all of whom are accused of enjoying opacity. The criticism is procedural and intense, pointing to an imbalance in oversight and the lack of justification for secrecy when no abuse has occurred. The speaker expresses confusion and demands clarification, essentially citing double standards.

The criticism targets the actions of the Health Board and the government. This is because, despite a lack of knowledge regarding the potential harm caused by wind turbines, planning processes are still moving forward. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting the knowledge deficits of the responsible agencies.