By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker demonstrates strong expertise in the fields of legislation, constitutional law, and criminal law. Specific legal terms are employed, such as "legitimate expectation," "abuse of official position," and "retroactive effect," with references also made to Supreme Court rulings. Particular emphasis is placed on knowledge regarding the consequences of previous legislative amendments (e.g., the abolition of provisions in the Penal Code in 2007).

The presenter demonstrates a strong understanding of the Language Act and the mandate of the Language Board (Keeleamet), knowing that the agency has the right to penalize individuals for violations. They directly link the issue of language preservation to migration activities and solving the labor shortage, proposing specific political solutions.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of specific Estonian mental hospitals (Seewald, Jämejala) and historical figures (Hitler, Napoleon) for rhetorical application. However, there is no evidence of deep scientific, technical, or data-driven knowledge regarding the topic being addressed.

The speaker exhibits a detailed understanding of how tax law is applied, citing specific vehicle models (Mercedes-Benz V 250) and the resulting discrepancies in tax liabilities when classifying vehicles as commercial vans versus passenger minivans. Furthermore, he utilizes legal reasoning, referencing the opinions of a Supreme Court justice concerning the right to challenge tax assessments in administrative court. Regarding foreign policy issues, he emphasizes the crucial role of evaluations provided by international observers and supporting legal documentation.

The speaker exhibits profound technical expertise in the measurement of infrasound and noise, citing physical laws and limitations inherent in measuring equipment (specifically frequencies below 10 Hz). A specific hazard—ice throw—and its corresponding danger radius are also highlighted, referencing the opinions of physics doctoral candidates from the University of Tartu and other experts.

The speaker uses generalizing language ("improving health," "repairing") and fails to demonstrate specific knowledge, data, or technical terminology related to the content of the bill. The treatment of the subject is more politically charged than based on expertise.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the Riigikogu's internal rules and working procedures, precisely citing the mechanism known as the "round of nimble fingers." Data is lacking regarding their command of broader political or technical topics.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in public interest and transparency regulations, focusing specifically on the varying requirements for disclosing the expense reimbursements of Riigikogu members and other high-ranking officials (ministers, the Chancellor of Justice, the Prosecutor's Office). This expertise is both procedural and institutional, underscoring the necessity for officials to explain and justify their professional decisions.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in energy production (wind turbines/generators), planning procedures, and public health legislation. Reference is made to specific projects (the Tootsi wind farm) and technical details (such as heights comparable to approximately 1000 TV towers). Furthermore, the speaker is knowledgeable about the work of the Social Affairs Committee and the official positions of the Health Board.