By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The rhetorical style is extremely aggressive, accusatory, and emotionally charged, employing strong moral and legal appeals. A threatening tone dominates, repeatedly referencing the possibility of criminal prosecution and imprisonment to exert pressure on the opposing party. The minister’s attitude is described as flippant and playful, which is contrasted with the legal gravity of the fraud.

The rhetorical style is one of concern and sharp criticism, voicing genuine worry about the evolving situation. He employs strong emotional appeals (for instance, labeling arguments "ridiculous") and metaphors, such as referring to the security threat as a "magic wand." He balances this criticism with a detailed procedural description, referencing his work on the special committee overseeing security agencies.

The style is extremely combative, accusatory, and urgent, employing strong language such as "fundamentally false," "absurd," and "idiotic." The speaker contrasts rational, "cerebral" discussion with the opponents' "spinal cord" reflexes and empty slogans. Legal logic and constitutional dogmatics are utilized, but the arguments are amplified by emotional comparisons (e.g., "mafioso approach" and "tyrannization").

The rhetorical style is combative and forceful, especially when criticizing government actions, which are characterized as threats and forced termination, rather than dialogue. Both logical argumentation (such as increased security risks and feeding Russian propaganda) and strong value-based appeals (like the persecution of Christians) are employed. The speaker supports their arguments by citing criticism from international authorities (the US administration).

The rhetorical style is combative, accusatory, and demanding, highlighting the public's lack of trust in the government, evidenced by low approval ratings. The text employs both logical arguments (the spiral of economic decline) and powerful emotional/ethical accusations (a criminal pattern, attacks on the rule of law). The speaker utilizes repetitive questioning to underscore the absence of a response and demand transparency.

The rhetorical style is analytical, demanding, and repetitive, focusing on logical argumentation and criticizing the lack of factual basis. A powerful comparative example (the case of the Catholic Church) is utilized to illustrate the violation of the rule of law. The tone is formal, yet simultaneously sharp, stressing the necessity for sober judgment and the absence of rational analysis on the opposing side.

The rhetorical style is confrontational, skeptical, and challenging. The speaker levels direct accusations concerning the lack of independence in Estonia's foreign policy and employs a logical appeal, demanding specific evidence from the opposing party to substantiate their position. The tone is formal, yet sharply critical.