By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The main opponents are the proponents of the bill (including former Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets and the Social Democrats), who are accused of mendacity, intolerance, and disregard for the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is intense and fundamental, claiming that the bill does not reduce but rather increases security threats. The speaker urges people not to comply with the state's unjust directives.

The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and colleague Anti Allas, accusing them of having forgotten about compensating reservists for eight years and conceptually rejecting the draft bill without basis. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's priorities, highlighting the annual salary increase for Riigikogu members as an irony. The criticism is intense and addresses both political priorities and procedural matters.

The main adversaries are the governing coalition, especially Eesti 200 (who are accused of disregarding democratic ideals and lacking a mandate) and the Social Democrats (whose members head the ERJK). Criticism is aimed both at policy (tax hikes, family policy) and procedures (the absence of constitutional analysis). The ERJK is characterized as a politically biased body, where "complete control is entirely in their hands," and compromise regarding the draft bill is ruled out.

The speaker indirectly criticizes the current national policy and the politicians who fail to translate the valuing of motherhood from words into action. The criticism is directed at the substance of the policy, not at individuals or procedures.

The main opponents are the government, the former Science Council (Irja Lutsar), and the agencies responsible for drug safety surveillance (the Health Board, the Ministry of Social Affairs), who are accused of conflicts of interest and covering up errors. The criticism is intense, describing the government's actions regarding pressure to vaccinate children as a "brutal outrage" and accusing the media and the courts of providing cover for the government. There is no willingness to compromise, as demands are being made for an immediate investigation and accountability.

The speaker opposes those who rejected the bill concerning the mandatory appearance of ministers, criticizing their stance as pragmatic and sidestepping universal rules. The criticism is directed at the coalition parties and ministers who may invoke their sovereign right to evade parliamentary scrutiny. The attacks are procedural and grounded in political consistency.

The main criticism is directed at the government's actions, particularly concerning the divergence in security policy and core values compared to the new US administration. The criticism is intense, labeling certain statements as "senseless yapping" and accusing the government of damaging Estonia's interests. Specifically, politicians Ilves and Mihkelson are criticized for their anti-US rhetoric.