By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker stresses cooperation and unity within their faction (EKRE), confirming that they are speaking on behalf of the entire faction. Other potential opponents of the draft bill from other factions are also mentioned, but no direct collaboration is described. No willingness to cooperate with the government is expressed; instead, support for the draft bill is categorically ruled out.

Shows readiness to support the proposals of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court regarding the simplification and streamlining of criminal proceedings, urging the coalition to take action. However, the relationship with the judiciary as a whole remains confrontational, demanding that they uphold a moral obligation and bear responsibility. Cooperation with SAPTK in previous complaints is also mentioned.

Insufficient data.

The style of cooperation points to similar views shared with other colleagues (Martin Helme is mentioned) who have likewise criticized the opposing side's responses. There is no data regarding cross-party compromise or cooperation.

The speaker bases their arguments on the positions and criticism of entrepreneurs and professional associations, noting that their proposals have not been taken into account. Data regarding inter-factional or coalition cooperation is lacking.

Regarding the child protection bill, there is a call for cross-party cooperation, emphasizing that this is a question of values that should unite all lawmakers. It is noted that the bill received generally supportive feedback in the committee, including from MPs representing the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200. The readiness to cooperate is high when dealing with topics related to morality and child protection.